User talk:Another Believer

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle, WA, in December 2023 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved
Extended content
File:Los Angeles, California (September 8, 2022) - 018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle metro, September 2023 - 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle metro, September 2023 - 097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and good composition -- Spurzem 20:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle metro, September 2023 - 090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:24, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle in May 2023 - 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης 20:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at COM:VPC#Street art and FOP in the US. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Another Believer. Perhaps you can clarify the provenance of this file? You're claiming it as "own work", but it's not clear whether that means you painted the image of Fieri or just photographed it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:13, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Marchjuly I just took the photograph. -Another Believer (talk) 13:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying that. Do you know anything more about the provenance of the work? Was it, for example, something painted or commissioned by Fieri? Is it just random unattributed graffiti? You photo also seems to show Fieri's signature so it looks like he might've painted it himself. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Marchjuly I replied here -Another Believer (talk) 01:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle in May 2023 - 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto, November 11, 2023 - 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is good, should have more specific filename though. --Plozessor 05:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto, November 10, 2023 - 086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle - September 2, 2023 - 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle in May 2023 - 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 21:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved
Extended content
File:Los Angeles, California (September 9, 2022) - 376.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:33, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved
Extended content
File:Little Pappasito's mural, Houston, 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please add at least some basic descriptions and categories to your uploads[edit]

When you don't do this, you create a ton of work for someone else. In particular, it is generally a lot harder for someone else than for you to work out where you were and what you were shooting. - Jmabel ! talk 21:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm comfortable with how I upload and categorize photos here at Commons. Almost all of my uploads are included in at least one user category, one date category, and one topic category (such as "Buildings in Seattle", or "Signs in Portland, Oregon"). Many times, I am more specific with categories, but rarely with descriptions. I'm not sure what you mean by "harder for someone else than for you to work out where you were and what you were shooting" -- the vast majority of my photos include a specific camera location, which allows any user to easily see where the photo was taken. -Another Believer (talk) 23:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It still leaves it to someone else to add the sort of description & categories that make them readily searchable. But, yes, this is your prerogative. - Jmabel ! talk 00:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you're looking at my most recent uploads, I have not finished categorizing a recent batch. But, overall, I feel like I do a decent job at categorizing my photos (and I even label most images in my user galleries). Can't say I'll change my habits re: descriptions. -Another Believer (talk) 02:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle - September 2, 2023 - 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle - September 2, 2023 - 80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle - September 2, 2023 - 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto, November 10, 2023 - 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle, WA, in April 2023 - 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle - September 2, 2023 - 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Thi 22:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto, November 11, 2023 - 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto, November 11, 2023 - 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality - Spurzem 10:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto, November 11, 2023 - 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality - Spurzem 10:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto, November 10, 2023 - 144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle metro, September 2023 - 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto, November 10, 2023 - 218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is ok but please give it a meaningful name. This is neither "Toronto" nor the "old city hall", it is a sign about the old city hall. --Plozessor 19:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Extended content
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 08:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco (February 2023) - 090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 11:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:February 2024, Seattle, WA - 095.jpg[edit]

Extended content
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:February 2024, Seattle, WA - 095.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
Didym (talk) 19:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! January 2024, Seattle, Washington, US - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! February 2024 in Seattle - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Laitche 14:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! February 2024 in Seattle - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! February 2024, Seattle, WA - 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! December 28, 2022, Seattle - 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --OmegaFallon 14:31, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! December 28, 2022, Seattle - 130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! February 2024, Seattle, WA - 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! February 2024, Seattle, WA - 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico - March 2023 - 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico - March 2023 - 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, Mexico (March 2023) - 198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, March 2023 -- 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:26, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! February 2024, Seattle, WA - 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, Mexico (March 2023) - 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 02:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deadline Approaching for Most Memorable Shot Submission![edit]

Extended content

Hello Another Believer !,

Camera1 mgx
Camera1 mgx
Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en
Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en

Just a quick reminder that the deadline for submitting your most memorable shot of 2023 is swiftly approaching! As tradition holds, since 2018, we've been sharing our favorite captures from the past year with each other. This year marks the sixth iteration of our beloved "Most Memorable Shot" tradition, and we're excited to see what everyone has to share.

Whether you're a member of the Commons Photographers User Group or not, you're warmly invited to participate. Your unique perspective adds to the richness of our community, and we'd love to see the world through your lens.

So, if you haven't already, take a moment to pick out your most cherished picture of 2023 and share it with us on the designated page. The deadline is February 29th, so don't let time slip away!

Let's keep this wonderful tradition alive and celebrate the beauty and diversity of our collective experiences through photography.

Looking forward to seeing your memorable shots!

Best regards,

Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 269.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 167.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 347.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 09:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 11:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:11, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 12:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK for a QI --Jakubhal 04:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Relativity 02:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 168.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 371.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 448.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 03:41, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:59, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta (November 2022) - 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta (November 2022) - 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta (November 2022) - 083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 18:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! February 2024, Seattle, WA - 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:04, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 446.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta (November 2022) - 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle, WA, in November 2023 - 145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington - 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington - 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington - 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Трифонов Андрей 19:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Трифонов Андрей 19:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lake View Cemetery[edit]

Breaking Lake View Cemetery into categories by year seems to me to be completely counterproductive. I can hardly imagine a scenario where someone cares specifically to find an image of anything in the cemetery in 2020 and would not be equally happy to find an image from 2022. I can easily imagine someone looking for a particular grave having to scan multiple categories now to find it. - Jmabel ! talk 17:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel I prefer not to find myself in categories with hundreds of images, but feel free to undo my subcategorization if you feel inclined. -Another Believer (talk) 17:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to end up with smaller categories, it would probably be really useful to break it down along the lines of some of the most photographed graves, or the groupings for certain families, which is what I imagine someone would more often be looking for. - Jmabel ! talk 17:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel Sure! I welcome whatever subcategories you think are appropriate! -Another Believer (talk) 17:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 12:14, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 12:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 12:41, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
File:Southeast Portland, Oregon (January 23, 2021) - 108.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dronebogus (talk) 12:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:53, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! February 2024, Seattle, WA - 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Picture is ok (could consider fixing the perspective but I wouldn't see that necessary in that special case); however, it needs a description of what this actually is. --Plozessor 05:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Being discussed here. -Another Believer 13:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! William F. Burris grave, Lake View Cemetery, Seattle, March 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 476 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 20:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, in April 2023 - 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:38, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 369 (crop).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 18:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (February 2024) - 311 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please add name of sculptor to image description so that the work is fully identified. --GRDN711 12:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done -Another Believer 13:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --GRDN711 13:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on April 13, 2024[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 9.00 UTC ( start time in your timezone (via zoneStamp!) (expected duration for 2 hrs). The primary agenda of this gathering will revolve around discussions regarding the Movement Charter. Your valuable input and participation in these discussions would be highly appreciated. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on April 13, 2024.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you.

All the best, -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle in April 2024 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle in April 2024 - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malecón, Puerto Vallarta (2014) - 08 (cropped).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Sky is a bit noisy, otherwise very good --MB-one 09:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC) Good quality. --Yann 09:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle, April 13, 2024 - 28 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 02:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle, April 13, 2024 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 02:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 12:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Almost overprocessed (by the iPhone?), but still good enough. Would recommend to shoot DNG and develop with external software. --MB-one 10:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle, April 13, 2024 - 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 04:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle, April 13, 2024 - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 01:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! March 2024 in Seattle, Washington, US - 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle, April 2024 - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle in December 2022, 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Riad Salih 14:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle, April 13, 2024 - 31 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle, April 13, 2024 - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Riad Salih 11:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle, April 13, 2024 - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 13:18, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seattle - April 13, 2024 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]